Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Yes, it would have been nice :thumbdown:Douh!
I saw the image of the AF assist lamp here and thought it was a spirit level (hopeful thinking I guess)
still ... it would be nice
I had to go back and find this quote--I hoped they wouldn't be that forgetful-- LOL. In truth, the quote is "and by the mere fact it was the first rangefinder style mirrorless interchangeable camera". Its the 'rangefinder' that is the defining word in there--thus leaving out the G1.Ahhh ... the anti-G1 sledgeing continues
how short are peoples memories?
But to be honest your quote is taken from a moment after SJ changed the text. "rangefinder style" wasn't there from the start.I had to go back and find this quote--I hoped they wouldn't be that forgetful-- LOL. In truth, the quote is "and by the mere fact it was the first rangefinder style mirrorless interchangeable camera". Its the 'rangefinder' that is the defining word in there--thus leaving out the G1.
I long for the day when Voigtländer and/or Contax come up with digital rangefinders to counter the M8 (and its price).Yes, but for me more in the sense that it may spur a healthy competition ...
Creative correction there! instead of acknowledging that G1 was the first - a sneaky insertion of 'rangefinder' gets the job doneBut to be honest your quote is taken from a moment after SJ changed the text. "rangefinder style" wasn't there from the start.
But that was expected, wasn't it; they have a quite "creative" approach to a lot of things at the DPR office.Creative correction there! instead of acknowledging that G1 was the first - a sneaky insertion of 'rangefinder' gets the job done
That's the real question, isn't it?(...) We'll see how it does and what it spurs Oly and Panny to do--if anything.
well, not without the right hardware inside ;-)Spirit levels are like slide rules, completely antique. All that can be done in the firmware now.
yes, and probably because at least I emailed them with that pointBut to be honest your quote is taken from a moment after SJ changed the text. "rangefinder style" wasn't there from the start.
... yes they do don't they. I'd want to complain, but that would be :deadhorse:But that was expected, wasn't it; they have a quite "creative" approach to a lot of things at the DPR office.