Some initial thoughts after my first tests with the P65+ after 3 months with the Aptus 75s & 3 years with a Sinar 54lv :
- the sinar remains the king of skin colors and will remain attached to my contax for this purpose
- the P65 technical qualities are amazing. Certainly more accurate than the Sinar, much more DR, of course more pixels. The perfect companion for the alpa and landscapes. I also find that the potential of the back is better reached with a tech camera.
- the aptus had some technical advantages over the sinar, but I prefered colors of sinar, a more film-like look. Sold it rapidly.
- I find that 22MPix is sufficient for portraits, where 60 are mostly interesting on landscapes
- sinar landscapes look also fantastic, but light must be really good to excel. Blacks/dark tones are amazing, highlights are not better than a D3x.
- even if the leaf is my less-prefered back, it remains great.
- I tend to think that sinar great colors come from the full linear processing more than from the 9m pixels
My totally subjective opinion, based on no experience except looking to pictures : I would mary a classic Hasselblad either with a P20+ or a CFV39 ...