Riley
New member
I said
"thyre very close as noise reading per ISO, at print sizes A900 has a fraction more than a stop on E5 (not enough to call 1.3 stops)"
this grab is of the screen size. taking a sample SN at 400 ISO
E5 31.4db
A900 32.1db
the difference is 0.7db, 0.231 of a stop difference, thats consistent to ISO3200
this grab is of the print size, taking a sample SN at 400 ISO
E5 33.4db
A900 36.9db
the difference is 3.5db, 1.165 stops difference, thats consistent to ISO3200
now enough of this nonsense I do not think it fair of you to blindly disagree at every opportunity and try to wear people down. Im busy and dont have time for further questioning of results that are right on the site for anyone to investigate.
IMO this matter is closed
"thyre very close as noise reading per ISO, at print sizes A900 has a fraction more than a stop on E5 (not enough to call 1.3 stops)"
this grab is of the screen size. taking a sample SN at 400 ISO
E5 31.4db
A900 32.1db
the difference is 0.7db, 0.231 of a stop difference, thats consistent to ISO3200
this grab is of the print size, taking a sample SN at 400 ISO
E5 33.4db
A900 36.9db
the difference is 3.5db, 1.165 stops difference, thats consistent to ISO3200
now enough of this nonsense I do not think it fair of you to blindly disagree at every opportunity and try to wear people down. Im busy and dont have time for further questioning of results that are right on the site for anyone to investigate.
IMO this matter is closed