pellicle
New member
Jorgen
particularly when you say:
Canon EF300 f2.8 IS => 2.7Kg with collar @ US$4,500
Olympus ED 300 f2.8 => 3.3Kg with collar @ US$6,499
particularly in light of your discussion here it seems I'm missing something here.
anyway ... pardon me for intruding
pardon me asking you to explain this, but I've been following (and contributing to) another thread and I don't understand.It's all a question of individual needs of course. The choice for me is between Olympus and Sony. The telephoto need is real, since I shoot motor-sports and sometimes golf. For golf, I even need longer, but a TC or even a good old 500mm f/8 reflex can solve that (golfers move slower than cars).
particularly when you say:
however what I see is:What makes Olympus stand out when it comes to the fast 300mm is a combination of optical quality, weight, size and price, and I've never doubted that 4/3 would be the best solution for that.
Canon EF300 f2.8 IS => 2.7Kg with collar @ US$4,500
Olympus ED 300 f2.8 => 3.3Kg with collar @ US$6,499
particularly in light of your discussion here it seems I'm missing something here.
anyway ... pardon me for intruding