I'll patiently wait for Guy to trade up from his IQ160 to the IQ180 then I'll look at picking up his used back. What's your guess on that move - September, October?... Yet ...
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
I'll patiently wait for Guy to trade up from his IQ160 to the IQ180 then I'll look at picking up his used back. What's your guess on that move - September, October?... Yet ...
My honest guess is that Guy will make that move BEFORE he even takes delivery of the IQ160! SERIOUSLY!I'll patiently wait for Guy to trade up from his IQ160 to the IQ180 then I'll look at picking up his used back. What's your guess on that move - September, October?
That's where I got in my testing with the 43 after about frame 3. FM is accurate enough that 100% view becomes almost redundant. (I am now using a setting of 45 for FM.) However, I do use use 100% view to confirm criticality on important details in images, so I am *really* glad it's there too.I was so into the focus mask I forgot about the 100 percent zoom
Let me explain this at default in C1 which is 250 whatever showed exact coverage of focus area on the LCD regardless of focus mask setting on back matched exactly on computer in C1 at C1s default setting of 250.Today I confirmed that whatever your focus mask is on the back directly goes into C1 exactly the same as what you see on your LCD. Very nice
Keith,I'd be the first to admit there are very real advantages to using tech cameras, both in terms of image quality and options.
My problem when using them is that they suck the joy from the process and consequently my images suffer. I should add that I know many for whom the opposite is true.
Each to their own.