The 138mm lens is a unique lens in numerous ways. Cost - the most expensive Rodenstock available. Design - Has a floating element design. Performance - I don't think there is any lens that matches it.
When it comes to performance, I like to quantify. I shot an early test against the 90 HR-SW and the 138mm seemed to eek out a slight advantage. A few weekends ago, I shot a very basic test against an Actar 120mm and an APO Sironar 120mm. I was intrigued by the 120mm APO Sironar. I've had very few sales of this lens, but some years back, one of my clients who owned one sent it in with their other lenses for conversion to X Shutter and as we tested it, we were pleasantly surprised at the performance.
So I wanted to re-visit this lens, since it is now down to $2,614 in our Rodenstock lens sale, a very very reasonable price. And last weekend I took those 3 lenses out for a quick test, I included the Actar 120 for a similar comparative and the 138mm for what we really would want to see for ideal results at a nearby focal length.
Rodenstock 12 Days of Christmas Sale Pricing
The 120mm APO Sironar outperformed the 120 Actar at larger shift, but it also produced flare. It was the only lens that was shot when the sun peaked out from the cloud, so I don't know if it is more or less prone to flare than other Rodenstocks.
The 138mm was clearly in another category. But it reminded me of a test I did a few weeks prior with the 90 HR-SW and the 70 HR-W. The 70 fulfilled its reputation as a very solid, if not cutting edge tech camera optic at a reasonable price, but the 90 just surpassed it, and most noticeably when shifted 20mm. It just looked perfect. And that is what the 138mm lens looks like when you shift it (even though there is no such thing as a perfect lens).
I'm interested in testing the 180mm lens against the 138mm, maybe in the next week or two, it's been rainy here.
Steve Hendrix/CI