Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Uwe - a man after my own heart. If you're out to get the image, then a zoom is the answer - even if there are IQ compromises.>I know if I only have one lens to work with, I want it a bit longer.
Yes, and for me that lens would be a zoom . Lets wait to see how good the X Pro1 image quality is in comparison to the NEX-7.
Indeed!I looked at this site,
I think the samples look very promising. Especially the 18mm corner test.
Apologies for asking. Have you posted any images here (this site)?WOW. The "Fun with the X-Pro1" thread is seven pages long and no one has bought on yet!
I have posted some images in the "Fun with MF," and couple in "Fun with the 645D," and a few other threads to show examples. I also posted in the Favorite Image of 2011 in the Leica forum even though it was not with a Leica--but others had done that before me.Apologies for asking. Have you posted any images here (this site)?
I am sorry, I have not seen any.
Him that doesn't sound right. I mean afaik they also don't believe in Isis, Shiva, Zeus, Apollo, Yukiyú, Quetzatcoalt, Thor and I think a few(ha!) others... What's does that make them then? Oh, atheists ;-)Vivek, thanks.
How does the expression go? Even the atheists are Christian; after all, it is a Christian god they don't believe in...
Sorry, the I was eluding to the folks here are all part of the X-Pro1 crowd even if they are not impressed by the camera as it is the X-Pro1 they making a reference too.Him that doesn't sound right. I mean afaik they also don't believe in Isis, Shiva, Zeus, Apollo, Yukiyú, Quetzatcoalt, Thor and I think a few(ha!) others... What's does that make them then? Oh, atheists ;-)
Raist
Cool. It's a good analogy with flawed logic (not the analogy but the saying). Haven't seen such thing in a while ;-)Sorry, the I was eluding to the folks here are all part of the X-Pro1 crowd even if they are not impressed by the camera as it is the X-Pro1 they making a reference too.
+1Uwe - a man after my own heart. If you're out to get the image, then a zoom is the answer - even if there are IQ compromises.
I think your images rather prove the point!
I haven't checked, but one of the comments is that having no AA filter allowed Fuji to reduce the registration distance between the rear of the lens and the sensor - doesn't sound likely that these lenses would fit the NEX.All I want is for someone to be able to adapt these lenses to the NEX body.
I haven't checked, but one of the comments is that having no AA filter allowed Fuji to reduce the registration distance between the rear of the lens and the sensor - doesn't sound likely that these lenses would fit the NEX.
This fly-by-wire business means no other camera adaptations unless one hacks the electronics of the lenses as well.Also unlikely to work since the lenses are focus by wire.
Brian
Fuji should study the focus by wire Olympus Digital ED 12mm f2 lens for features its XF lenses should have: http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/olympus_m_zuiko_digital_ed_12mm_f_2_review/ :bugeyes:I haven't checked, but one of the comments is that having no AA filter allowed Fuji to reduce the registration distance between the rear of the lens and the sensor - doesn't sound likely that these lenses would fit the NEX.
Also unlikely to work since the lenses are focus by wire.
Brian
http://www.opensourcecamera.org/Perhaps one day, people will be connected enough to be able to commission their own 'open camera' system.