lightnmagic
Well-known member
I took like 7 images within a span of seconds ..doesn’t appear in any of them besides the above ….I do believe we r not alone ….would be paradigm shift when that’s officially acknowledgedArea 51 ...
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
I took like 7 images within a span of seconds ..doesn’t appear in any of them besides the above ….I do believe we r not alone ….would be paradigm shift when that’s officially acknowledgedArea 51 ...
Now that’s a whole conversation by itself on portals and star gatesIt's a Space-Time Continuum Portal .....
... I have a question - please don't be angry -Rat Rod . The owner came all the way from Alberta canada
View attachment 211222
I like to show movement if I can on still images ...A friend had a smoke dispenser to create this effect
View attachment 211223
View attachment 211224
View attachment 211252
So yes i do use photoshop to add effects to an image which for me makes it interesting...but the key subject in all my pict is not AI generated... I have a question - please don't be angry -
have these pictures been photographed or taken with AI?
I've seen inconsistencies in some of your pictures that I can't explain.
In the penultimate picture, the car is in the centre.
The one wheel position on the right shows the car travelling straight ahead -
with the other wheel the car is turning right!
How can this be explained?
thank you for your answer.So yes i do use photoshop to add effects to an image which for me makes it interesting...but the key subject in all my pict is not AI generated
While I like to answer your above q's....Like to say if. you keep taking pictures of what you see....you can logically only get more of what you are observingthank you for your answer.
I still have a few questions -
does that mean that the situations in the picture as we see them here never existed?
the cars and the landscapes were photographed, edited and recomposed by you?
or are these your compositions with available picture elements?
That's true, but not the whole truth!While I like to answer your above q's....Like to say if. you keep taking pictures of what you see....you can logically only get more of what you are observing
The title of this thread is planes, Trains and automobiles.....I think my picts meet that criteria .......However I do agree that on my images to put a note on how it was created so the viewer can know ......Other than that if you dont like something dont "look"....Its always an option ...your attention would be missed thoughThat's true, but not the whole truth!
Even if twenty photographers take pictures in the forest and together they take hundreds of pictures, no two will be the same.
There are masters of photography who create iconic views, recognise the decisive moment, create images that cast a spell, images that don't let go, images that can tell whole stories with one photo, images with the power to change the course of events ...
We practise this here and show it to our colleagues for assessment, to talk about it and to motivate and improve ourselves.
You create photorealistic works and create a story.
I have no objection to this if it is labelled as such in a photo forum.
Perhaps a separate area for such work would also be conceivable?
Perfect!I do agree that on my images to put a note on how it was created so the viewer can know