Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
f2.8?Well, if you think the XF100-400 is big, wait till you see the rumoured XF150-600 ...
Well, that makes the 70-300 smaller and a better deal.Well, if you think the XF100-400 is big, wait till you see the rumoured XF150-600 ...
The timing of the GFX100s launch was beyond perfect. The Sony went from being a "must have" to "do I really need 30 fps?" in two days.Really great camera
You all know what - when I saw the release of the Sony A1 2 days ago I thought I must have one ....
But after that introduction of the GFX 100S yesterday it is very clear for me I need this one instead of the Sony and maybe this is the start for me to get back into MF again -after almost 10 years
I think the two cameras cater to a quite different customer base. I don't think we'll see many Fuji's and certainly not the GF100's at the Olympics (if it goes ahead)The timing of the GFX100s launch was beyond perfect. The Sony went from being a "must have" to "do I really need 30 fps?" in two days.
Clearly not. The longest lens is around 200mm eqv., and 100MP isn't even desirable for sports. For what I do on he other hand, industrial, product and travel photography, it shreds the Sony and any other camera to pieces. I will survive just fine without it of course, but it would open up some very nice possibilities.I think the two cameras cater to a quite different customer base. I don't think we'll see many Fuji's and certainly not the GF100's at the Olympics (if it goes ahead)
You really like hyperboles, don't you?it shreds the Sony and any other camera to pieces.
Each camera should of course come with a new M1 Mac to handle the processing of the filesOne feature which is putting me off is the 100mpx sensor. It puts a lot of strain on post processing. I could probably handle it but it is something I think all purchasers need to be aware of. It sounds like the camera produces upwards of 300mb tif files in post processing.
I can't help feeling that Fuji are letting themselves be influenced by the unnecessary 'mega-pixel' marketing game which seems to be influencing products more than it needs to be.
All power to Fuji if they do acquire market share by people easily influenced by features rather than benefits but is it sustainable?
There could be a rash of s/h 100s on the market a few months after initial purchases by 'gas' buyers realises (a) they can't easily photograph their kids with the camera, (b) it takes a lot of skill to use such a camera for anything that moves.
I feel confident I could exploit the benefits of the extra mpx but I'm still left wondering whether Fuji should have used all the progress in minimising components to create something like a small improvement in sensor size (60mpx?) to satisfy the desire (not need) of some but an IBIS improved smaller bodied 50sII, especially as one of the strongest features of the 50s is actually the ability to add the tilt swivel adapter (which you can't with the new 100s).
Just my two cents.
LouisB